What's it all about?


Thanks to Rick Matz of Cook Ding’s Kitchen (see blogroll links) I got to hear a great quote from Venerable Master Sheng-yen:

“Be soft in your practice. Think of the method as a fine silvery stream, not a raging waterfall. Follow the stream, have faith in its course. It will go its own way, meandering here, trickling there. It will find the grooves, the cracks, the crevices. Just follow it.Never let it out of your sight. It will take you there.”

And in looking for the source of this wisdom (upon which I hope to contemplate a bit) I found a blog called Tai Chi Cork http://taichicork.blogspot.com/

Tai Chi Cork offerred this advice which I agree with wholeheartedly:

“If the only prayer you said in your whole life was ‘Thank You’, that would suffice.”  -  Meister Eckhart

My kung fu goals are

Simple; I want to have a

Practice all my days.

Here’s a quickie.  Does it have anything to do with taiji… really?  Who knows?  Who cares?                 ;-)

For some time now I’ve been mindful of how I pass through the heavy swinging doors at my workplace.  They’re heavy — fire doors, I guess — and they have those closer gadgets so it closes behind you.  Takes some muscle to open these doors.  And usually you just want to get from point A to point B.  If you address the door in a wimpy way, you pass through slowly and with struggle.  If you come on strong, there are other silly issues that can arise.

So what I’ve been working on for many months is, open it with firmness and dispatch, but minimal effort and bodily motion.

It’s taught me some things about weight shifting, force transfer, and whatnot.  Usually the emphasis seems to be what’s going on at ground level: my two feet; sinking energy, etc.  The learning potential is not unlimited, to put it mildly.  But since I have to go through the friggin’ door anyway, I’m happy to squeeze some extra benefit out of the time and effort involved.

Today was interesting.  I felt a new thing occur.  The door popped open quite neatly and for once it wasn’t the vertical-energy axis that stood out.  Instead I felt a subtle, fleeting, distinct change in state from one side of my body to the next.  That’s what seemed to open the door.  Minimal force, minimal movement.

What was it?  Dunno.  Just noted it and tried to remember the feeling.  Taiji-ness?  The IMA equivalent of “air guitar”?  Early senility?  Maybe there’ll be a follow-up.  Maybe there won’t.  I can’t really talk about this stuff to the people around me.  Thank goodness for blogging.

I think I know a little bit more

About things than I did before

When I thought I knew a little bit more

About things than I did before.

What is more useful?

A knot, or a string that is

Not a knot — not yet.

The only thing we

Do directly in taiji

Is talk about it.

I tend to think of myself as not being particularly ego-driven.  But just now I was fooling around, re-reading a few of my old posts from a year ago, and this one hit me in the right way.  Like, I need to consider this all over again.  So I’m reprinting it!  Not the Taijiquestion yak-yak, just the meat of the article (see below).

I had a strange reaction to the Olympic torch being carried to the top of Mount Everest.  I’m an amateur mountain climber and rock climber, as I’ve mentioned before.  I do not use equipment, so Everest is forever beyond my grasp and also most of the expert-level climbs around the world.  That doesn’t bother me.  I just want to get higher than I am.  Also, as Captain Jean-Luc Picard once said of climbing, “There’s just something about holding your own life in your hands”.  And how, Brother!

But what I usually think about Everest in recent years, is that the world’s highest mountain ain’t what it used to be.  It has been climbed solo, it has been climbed without oxygen tanks, and it is climbed all the time now.  I think this is called progress in climbing science.  But it ain’t progress in exploration, it ain’t progress in new frontiers, it is not even progress in adventure.  So — what’s next?  That’s a question we must all answer for ourselves.

But climbing to new heights is always the goal for some of us.  I’m a Capricorn by the way.  One of my co-workers who’s very knowledgeable about astrology ran a professional chart for me, after I provided my exact time and place of birth.  The results were very startling.  Someone who didn’t really know me at all well was able to penetrate some deep aspects of my personality… things I barely tell myself, but which are clearly true once examined.  I’d like to remain skeptical — but results speak for themselves!

In the Chinese zodiac I’m a Rooster.  I’m still looking into that and don’t have much to say yet, except that luckily I’m not incompatible with my Rat wife and Tiger son.  Meanwhile I try to understand things like this here exposition:

>>>>> ”Before beginning this instruction, it is important, I think, to understand the difference between Host and Guest.

 In the Surangama Sutra, Arya Ajnatakaundinya asks, “What is the difference between settled and transient?” He answers by giving the example of a traveler who stops at an inn.  The traveler dines and sleeps and then continues on his way.  He doesn’t stop and settle there at the inn, he just pays his bill and departs, resuming his journey.  But what about the innkeeper?  He doesn’t go anywhere.  He continues to reside at the inn because that is where he lives.

 ”I say, therefore, that the transient is the guest and the innkeeper is the host,” says Arya Ajnatakaundinya.

  And so we identify the ego’s myriad thoughts which rise and fall in the stream of consciousness as transients, travelers who come and go and who should not be detained with discursive examinations.  Our Buddha Self is the host who lets the travelers pass without hindrance.  A good host does not detain his guests with idle chatter when they are ready to depart.

 Therefore, just as the host does not pack up and leave with his guests, we should not follow our transient thoughts.  We should simply let them pass, unobstructed.

 Many people strive to empty their mind of all thoughts.  This is their meditation practice.  They try not to think.  They think and think, “I will not think.” This is a very difficult technique and one that is not recommended for beginners.  Actually, the state of “no-mind” that they seek is an advanced spiritual state.  There are many spiritual states that must precede it.

 Progress in Chan is rather like trying to climb a high mountain.  We start at the bottom.  What is our destination?  Not the summit but merely our base camp, Camp 1.  After we have rested there, we resume our ascent.  But again, our destination is not the summit, but merely Camp 2.  We attempt the summit only from our final Camp.

 Nobody would dream of trying to scale Mount Everest in one quick ascent.  And the summit of Chan is higher than Everest’s!  Yet in Chan, everybody wants to start at the end.  Nobody wants to start at the beginning.  If beginners could take an airplane to the top they would, but then this would not be mountain climbing, would it?  Enthusiasm for the achievement is what makes people try to take shortcuts.  But the journey is the real achievement.” <<<<<

(This text is from a website called J.Crow, it’s now in my links as “Empty Cloud”)

Tea is a substance rightly prized for its salutary effects.

Effects.

So.  Give a man a cup of tea, and he can drink tea for ten minutes.

Teach a man to drink tea from an empty cup, and he will always be able to drink tea.

Almost a throwaway title, I thought… then realized that concepts & passions is not bad.  If you can combine the two, the result can be very powerful.  I don’t claim this for myself, but there are some men and women throughout history who have done much.  And it wasn’t by accident.  Margaret Sanger is one name that comes to mind.  Or how about Dr. Martin Luther King?

Anyway just for fun I clicked on the “Clyfford Still” link in my blogroll links.  Clyfford Still has been maybe my favorite artist since I found out about him over twenty years ago.  His work just speaks directly and wordlessly of the infinite, the mysterious, the Hidden Alternative.  His paintings were huge, both in their physical dimensions, and in what the artist tried to bring forth.

The man himself was a stubborn, idealistic, driven, iconoclastic sort.  I read a whole bunch of his letters in a book I have.  But I just found some interesting quotes via the link.

>>>”A great free joy surges through me when I work . . . with tense slashes and a few thrusts the beautiful white fields receive their color and the work is finished in a few minutes.”

“I hold it imperative to evolve an instrument of thought which will aid in cutting through all cultural opiates, past and present, so that a direct, immediate, and truly free vision can be achieved. . .and I affirm my profound concern to achieve a purpose beyond vanity, ambition, or remembrance.”

“How can we live and die and never know the difference?”

“To be stopped by a frame’s edge is intolerable.”<<<

One of the quotations (which I abridged) seemed to refer to a bullfighter as a sort of role model.  I found this fascinating, and looked it up, sure enough the artist was referring to a famous matador and I discovered a very interesting article:

http://coloquio.com/toros/pillars.html

I know nothing about bullfighting really, and I’m aware of the modern argument involving cruelty to animals, which I’m reasonably sympathetic to.  I could mention that the factory “farming” that produces 80 billion fast-food hamburgers is far crueler than a few bullfights.  But that’s beside the point, we’re talking about concepts & passions.  Here is a side of bullfighting I didn’t know existed:

>>>”I went to the ring like a mathematician going to the blackboard to prove a theorem. At that time the art of bullfighting was governed by the picturesque axiom of “Lagartijo” which said, ‘you stand there, and either you move yourself or the bull moves you’. I was there to demonstrate that this was not self-evident as they thought. My theory was ‘you stand there, and the bull does not move you… if you know how to fight’. At that time was a complicated system of ‘territories’ of the bull and ‘territories’ of the “torero”, which in my judgement was quite superfluous. The bull has no territory, because it is not reasoning creature and there is no surveyor to lay down the boundaries. All the ground belong to the “torero”, the only intelligent being in the game, and it seemed natural to me that he should keep it.”

 
 

 

Spaces are by definition empty, but they can still be yin or yang, I decided.  Or maybe better to just say that they are yin and yang?  I’m still working on this particular way of viewing space, and movement.

Every thing occupies a space.  Some things (us for example) move into and out of spaces all the time.  Other things squat or stand in their space for long periods of time.  Other spaces are left vacant, seemingly.  But change is always a possibility.  Furthermore, the existance of possibility leads us to yin and yang.

Binary code?  No — we have black, white, and gray.  Never fixed, always extending and blending; seeping in and out.  But the binary concept is a handy shorthand that helps everyday comprehension.  In taiji we place special emphasis on the changing from and into…

Next Page »